[yt-dev] off_axis_projection

[Sam Skillman]

Hi all,

I think the only kwarg I'd be really +1 with getting rid of would be
no_ghost.  interpolated=True should just trigger no_ghost=False, and
interpolated=False doesn't use the ghost zones no matter what.  I think
volume should stay, especially since I think it will soon be possible to do
an off_axis_projection of a data object which would probably be fed in
through the volume.

Sam

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Elizabeth,
>
> I agree, this makes sense.
>
> Last night I tried to take a crack at this, but I got very confused
> with the various definitions of volume, interpolated, etc etc, in the
> routine off_axis_projection.  Cameron and Sam, do you think it would
> be okay if we simplified this routine and relied on the
> ProjectionCamera for advanced things, like specifying a volume?
>
> -Matt
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Elizabeth Tasker
> <tasker at astro1.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > "off_axis_projection" doesn't seem to accept field parameters.
> >
> > This isn't a big problem and I can definitely get around it by using
> global variables, but should it have a field_parameter option for
> consistency with add_projection?
> >
> > Elizabeth
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > yt-dev mailing list
> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20120628/bfb6a0e7/attachment.html>