matthewturk at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 08:53:00 PDT 2012
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Sam Skillman <samskillman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I think the only kwarg I'd be really +1 with getting rid of would be
> no_ghost. interpolated=True should just trigger no_ghost=False, and
> interpolated=False doesn't use the ghost zones no matter what. I think
> volume should stay, especially since I think it will soon be possible to do
> an off_axis_projection of a data object which would probably be fed in
> through the volume.
Why not get rid of volume and instead supply data_source, like projections?
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Elizabeth,
>> I agree, this makes sense.
>> Last night I tried to take a crack at this, but I got very confused
>> with the various definitions of volume, interpolated, etc etc, in the
>> routine off_axis_projection. Cameron and Sam, do you think it would
>> be okay if we simplified this routine and relied on the
>> ProjectionCamera for advanced things, like specifying a volume?
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Elizabeth Tasker
>> <tasker at astro1.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > "off_axis_projection" doesn't seem to accept field parameters.
>> > This isn't a big problem and I can definitely get around it by using
>> > global variables, but should it have a field_parameter option for
>> > consistency with add_projection?
>> > Elizabeth
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > yt-dev mailing list
>> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
More information about the yt-dev