matthewturk at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 08:39:56 PDT 2012
I agree, this makes sense.
Last night I tried to take a crack at this, but I got very confused
with the various definitions of volume, interpolated, etc etc, in the
routine off_axis_projection. Cameron and Sam, do you think it would
be okay if we simplified this routine and relied on the
ProjectionCamera for advanced things, like specifying a volume?
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Elizabeth Tasker
<tasker at astro1.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> wrote:
> "off_axis_projection" doesn't seem to accept field parameters.
> This isn't a big problem and I can definitely get around it by using global variables, but should it have a field_parameter option for consistency with add_projection?
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
More information about the yt-dev