[yt-users] Problem with smoothed covering grid

Max Grönke max.gronke at astro.uio.no
Tue Oct 6 08:29:05 PDT 2015


Thanks!

For the moment we found a workaround (generic sph --> gadget) but for
the future this might come handy.

Best,
Max

On 6 October 2015 at 17:14, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> This actually related to a new feature Bili Dong recently added:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/1769/add-add_smoothed_particle_field/diff
>
> This PR adds new functionality to make it easier to define SPH smoothed
> fields. Maybe that will help?
>
> -Nathan
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Max Grönke <max.gronke at astro.uio.no> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nathan.
>> Thanks for your reply. Here's the new link:
>> http://paste.yt-project.org/show/5930/
>>
>> I think I figured out the problem -- at least in theory ;)  I guess
>> what I need is a "smoothed field". This meant I played around with
>> "add_volume_weighted_smoothed_field". But although
>>
>> > fn_smooth =
>> > add_volume_weighted_smoothed_field("all","particle_position",
>> > "particle_mass", "smoothing_length",
>> >                                               "particle_density",
>> > "particle_density", ds.field_info, 64)
>>
>> (where `ds' is my YT Particle Data Set)
>>
>> seems to work, I cannot access the newly created field?
>> ("YTFieldNotFound: Could not find field '('deposit',
>> 'all_smoothed_particle_density')' in ParticleData.")
>>
>> Thanks for your help,
>> Max
>>
>>
>> On 5 October 2015 at 17:41, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Max,
>> >
>> > I'm unable to load the pastebin link in your e-mail.  Can you re-send
>> > using
>> > a different pastebin service? We have paste.yt-project.org set up for
>> > this
>> > purpose.
>> >
>> > Matt also has an open pull request that among other things adds support
>> > to
>> > arbitrary_grid for fluid fields:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/1763/numpy-like-operations/diff
>> >
>> > -Nathan
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Max Grönke <max.gronke at astro.uio.no>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Matthew,
>> >>
>> >> thanks for your prompt response!
>> >>
>> >> I tried the covering_grid first but as I said we had problems with a
>> >> lot of zero-valued grid points. It seems the values from the coarser
>> >> grid are not duplicated downwards?
>> >> I tried to post a MWE to illustrate what I mean:
>> >> http://pastebin.com/yishxbjW
>> >>
>> >> For the arbitrary_grid: It says it cannot deal with fluid variables?
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Max
>> >>
>> >> On 2 October 2015 at 16:44, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Max,
>> >> >
>> >> > Ah, I think I see the problem.  If you're doing any type of particle
>> >> > deposition, including smoothing, you might be better suited to using
>> >> > the arbitrary_grid or the covering_grid objects, as
>> >> > smoothed_covering_grid is designed for situations where values need
>> >> > to
>> >> > be interpolated through a cascade of refinements.  It'd probably end
>> >> > up being faster to use either arbitrary_grid or covering_grid, too.
>> >> > Can you try that and let us know if it meets your needs?
>> >> >
>> >> > -Matt
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Max Grönke <max.gronke at astro.uio.no>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Hi everybody!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I followed loosely the example provided here
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://yt-project.org/docs/dev/examining/low_level_inspection.html#examining-grid-data-in-a-fixed-resolution-array
>> >> >> but encountered an error message using a smoothed covering grid with
>> >> >> SPH data instead of a covering grid. I posted an MWE here:
>> >> >> http://pastebin.com/2sStpLmw which leads to the error message
>> >> >> "AttributeError: 'YTSmoothedCoveringGrid' object has no attribute
>> >> >> '_pdata_source' "
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I wanted to use a smoothed covering grid because I found that using
>> >> >> SPH data a lot of "holes" are in `covering grid' (but not, e.g., in
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> slice plot). So I assumed there is some problem in duplicating the
>> >> >> values from the coarser grids?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> My yt version is 3.2-dev.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks a lot for your time & help,
>> >> >> Max
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> yt-users mailing list
>> >> >> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>> >> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > yt-users mailing list
>> >> > yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>> >> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> yt-users mailing list
>> >> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > yt-users mailing list
>> > yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-users mailing list
>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-users mailing list
> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>



More information about the yt-users mailing list