[yt-users] length of octree and smoothed arrays

Desika Narayanan dnarayan at haverford.edu
Thu Jun 12 11:43:46 PDT 2014


Hi Matt,

Thanks - it's the factor of 8 that was throwing me off.  Once I account for
that, the numbers make sense.

thanks
-desika


On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Desika,
>
> Your particles are pretty randomly distributed, so it's refining
> everywhere up to a given level.  Try changing to np.random.normal, but
> you might need to clip.  There's also a factor of eight for leaf
> nodes, because a leaf node by default becomes eight cells.
>
> http://paste.yt-project.org/show/4782/
>
> This gives the results I was expecting.  Do they look okay to you?
>
> -Matt
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Desika Narayanan
> <dnarayan at haverford.edu> wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > I just did yt update very recently (like an hour ago).  an hg id gives:
> >
> > yt-hg desika$ hg id
> >
> > ea182fc68fae (yt-3.0) tip
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Desika,
> >>
> >> I actually can't get your script to run.  Which changeset are you on?
> >>
> >> -Matt
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Desika Narayanan
> >> <dnarayan at haverford.edu> wrote:
> >> > Hi Matt,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks - the numbers are the same as the length of the numbers of ones
> >> > in
> >> > saved['octree'], total sizes of octree and size of density array:
> >> >
> >> > saved["octree"].sum()  = 4681
> >> > saved["octree"].size  = 37499
> >> > ad["deposit", "all_density"].size = 262144
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Desika,
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Desika Narayanan
> >> >> <dnarayan at haverford.edu> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi All,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > First, I'm on an updated yt 3.0 updated about 5 minutes ago. (hg
> id:
> >> >> > ea182fc68fae (yt-3.0) tip)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This might be related to Matt's update on octree on June 8th (in
> >> >> > response to
> >> >> > the CIC stuff) that I don't quite understand, but I've run into the
> >> >> > following issue highlighted in the example code:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://paste.yt-project.org/show/4781/
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Here, I create a fake data set (motivated by Nathan's shared
> notebook
> >> >> > earlier this week), construct the octree, and then smooth the
> density
> >> >> > onto a
> >> >> > grid with:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>density = ad["deposit","all_density"]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What I find is that the number of elements in the density array is
> >> >> > not
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > same as the number of 0's (i.e Falses) in the generated octree
> >> >> > (revealed
> >> >> > by
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>saved["octree"]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > in the above script).   Nominally, I thought the smoothing happened
> >> >> > onto
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > same octree mesh that I generate with
> >> >> > ds.index.oct_handler.save_octree().
> >> >> > Is this not the case?  Or, is there a way to make it the case in
> the
> >> >> > order
> >> >> > that I call things?
> >> >>
> >> >> No, it should all be the same.  What're the values of:
> >> >>
> >> >> saved["octree"].sum()
> >> >> saved["octree"].size
> >> >> ad["deposit", "all_density"].size
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > desika
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > yt-users mailing list
> >> >> > yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> >> >> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
> >> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> yt-users mailing list
> >> >> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> >> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > yt-users mailing list
> >> > yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> >> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> yt-users mailing list
> >> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > yt-users mailing list
> > yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> yt-users mailing list
> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-users-spacepope.org/attachments/20140612/4b3636d5/attachment.html>


More information about the yt-users mailing list