[yt-dev] Analysis module review process

John ZuHone jzuhone at gmail.com
Tue Dec 29 14:41:45 PST 2015


+1 for lowering the barrier. At a minimum, tests should pass, and new tests should be encouraged if possible. Docs as well.

Not too worried about 1 or 2 approvals. We could try 2 at first to see if this helps things out. 

> On Dec 29, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> As long as the code being changed is local to an analysis module and not used by other parts of the main yt codebase, yes, I'm all for dropping the 3 reviewer requirement to 2.  1 might be pushing it though.
> 
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com <mailto:matthewturk at gmail.com>> wrote:
> That's precisely what I had in mind.
> 
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com <mailto:nathan12343 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com <mailto:matthewturk at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> [+-][01] on reducing review overhead for analysis modules?
> >
> >
> > Does this just mean reducing the number of PR reviewers before we merge pull
> > requests? I'd be ok with that, but just want to clarify what you have in
> > mind.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > yt-dev mailing list
> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org <mailto:yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org>
> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org <http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org <mailto:yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org>
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org <http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cameron Hummels
> NSF Postdoctoral Fellow
> Department of Astronomy
> California Institute of Technology
> http://chummels.org <http://chummels.org/>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20151229/8586b44f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
yt-dev mailing list
yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org


More information about the yt-dev mailing list