[yt-dev] SciPy abstract submission

Nathan Goldbaum nathan12343 at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 10:42:25 PDT 2014


Hi all,

So there seems to be two issues with submitting our abstract.

First, there doesn't seem to be a way to add additional authors to the
abstract.  Matt, I think you're on the organizing committee for the
conference - is it appropriate for us to be submitting a talk with
more than one speaker?  How do I indicate that on the abstract
submission form.

Second, in addition to the abstract, which we've already written,
there needs to be a "Detailed Abstract" -- the form indicates this
should be an outline for the talk -- which will not be printed in the
program but will be made public on the conference website.  We'll need
to collectively write this before we can submit our talk for
consideration.

-Nathan

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I'll take care of it!
>
> -Nathan
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I submitted the sprint.  Anyone else want to take a crack at the
>> abstract for the talk?
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Matt,
>>>>
>>>> Like I mentioned in the last e-mail thread, I'm interested in going to
>>>> scipy.  I had in mind taking more of a leadership role for a yt talk,
>>>> if only so I can get my name and face out there a bit more prominently
>>>> as I get ready to apply for jobs.
>>>
>>> I think that's a great idea.  As I noted ... "I do not have any
>>> particular interest in acting as the primary presenter."  :)  I think
>>> we should divide it up between people that are attending.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Would you be interested in having more input from me on the abstract?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>> Right now it's mostly focused on things in your wheelhouse.
>>>>
>>>> Alternatively I'd be happy to submit a separate abstract if you think
>>>> that would be best.
>>>
>>> It's up to you, but I'm moderately -1 on that.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Nathan
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> The (nominal) due date for submissions for SciPy2014 is next Friday:
>>>>> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/ .  I think we should aim to
>>>>> have a strong presence there -- I've heard from a couple people they
>>>>> plan to be there, which is *awesome*.  For various reasons, I am only
>>>>> going to be traveling to the yt workshop in Santa Cruz and SciPy for a
>>>>> little while, so I am planning to be there the entire duration.  There
>>>>> are a few things I think we should consider:
>>>>>
>>>>>  * A joint talk introducing yt 3.0, where everyone in attendance
>>>>> either participates in the talk or acts as ambassadors.  I want this
>>>>> to be submitted to the general track.  I do not have any particular
>>>>> interest in acting as the primary presenter.
>>>>>  * Sprints!  For sure.
>>>>>  * Possibly a talk submitted to the astro track about domain-specific
>>>>> stuff, like Hilary's spectrum generator, or John's Chandra generator,
>>>>> or the integration with Rockstar, or even AGORA.
>>>>>  * We should participate in the WSSSPE workshop, which will be on
>>>>> Thursday afternoon.  Looks like right now I'll be co-chairing this.
>>>>>  * We may consider submitting a poster in addition, which emphasizes
>>>>> things like outreach using yt.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are my drafts of the sprint and talk abstracts.  You should be
>>>>> able to provide comments on them by right-clicking.  If you want
>>>>> direct edit privs, let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/15BakPzOLdN6IIjx3jDFyD4Jg01ing1uQ9nIgKFy--7k/edit
>>>>>
>>>>> Options I think we should pass on:
>>>>>
>>>>>  * yt-centric tutorial: we will get to the point that I think this is
>>>>> a good idea, but I don't think we'd get enough people signing up for
>>>>> it.
>>>>>  * yt-BOF.  It might be worthwhile to consider setting up a BOF for
>>>>> data analysis of spatial data, though.  (Not just GIS.)
>>>>>
>>>>> I will be submitting a talk about ZeroPy as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matt
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org



More information about the yt-dev mailing list