[yt-dev] [enzo-dev] testing: current gold standard on Amazon

[Matthew Turk]

Hi Britton,

If this gives more accurate results, I'd say we should update the gold
standard instead of reverting the change.  Don't you?

-Matt

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry, that was me!  I made that change because sometimes you get
> inconsistencies between what the time series object thinks is the final time
> (or redshift) of the simulation and what the time (or redshift) is of the
> last dataset found.  This only happens when the time series is created with
> find_outputs set to True to manually find all datasets on disk.
> Unfortunately, this is how all the test scripts are currently set up, so
> this screws up some of those results.  I forgot about this when I made the
> change.  I am open to reverting it if people think that is best.
>
> Britton
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Michael Kuhlen <mqk at astro.berkeley.edu>
> wrote:
>>
>> 6d71f5517955
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "enzo-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to enzo-dev at googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> enzo-dev+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/enzo-dev?hl=en.