[yt-dev] 3.0 version labeled as '2.5-dev'

Casey W. Stark caseywstark at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 12:24:00 PST 2013


Hey Matt.

If I remember, that was for GDF writing. We needed a yt version string for
that GDF attribute.

- Casey


On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Nathan,
>
> Ah, oops.  Yeah, looks like that slipped under my radar; I don't even
> remember when Casey added it.  I'll update it, but that should only be
> considered very coarse-grained information -- the actual version
> number can be gotten with get_version_stack() or get_yt_version(),
> both of which are in mods.
>
> -Matt
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > I believe Anthony is referring to yt/__init__.py, where version is set
> to "2.5-dev" in my copy.
> >
> > -Nathan
> >
> > On Jan 15, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Matthew Turk wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Anthony,
> >>
> >> In the tip of my clone it's set to 3.0 in setup.py.
> >>
> >> Also, I have recently merged from yt 2.x but not yet pushed to the
> >> main repository.  I've been working on "acceptance scripts" here:
> >>
> >> https://bitbucket.org/MatthewTurk/yt.acceptance_scripts/
> >>
> >> These include links to datasets and checks on the data.  If you get a
> >> chance, could you add download and testing checks for the polar data
> >> to it?  I'll push the big merge to the main repository in a few
> >> minutes.
> >>
> >> -Matt
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Hi Anthony,
> >>>
> >>> I believe that's an oversight and it should be 3.0-dev - compare to
> the VERSION variable in the setup script.
> >>>
> >>> Matt, can you confirm that?
> >>>
> >>> -Nathan
> >>>
> >>> On Jan 15, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello All,
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there some special reason that the __version__ in yt-3.0 is listed
> as '2.5-dev'?  Am I missing something subtle about the release schedule or
> is this safe to change?
> >>>>
> >>>> Be Well
> >>>> Anthony
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> yt-dev mailing list
> >> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > yt-dev mailing list
> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20130115/7f50c938/attachment.htm>


More information about the yt-dev mailing list