[yt-dev] 3.0 version labeled as '2.5-dev'

Matthew Turk matthewturk at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 12:38:13 PST 2013


Ah, right -- makes sense.

For what it's worth, I've updated the acceptance scripts and pushed a
series of changesets that

1) Merges with 2.x
2) Fixes a bug with RAMSES IO

I've also pushed in the recent pull request I issued where I added a
binary gadget data reader.

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Casey W. Stark <caseywstark at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Matt.
>
> If I remember, that was for GDF writing. We needed a yt version string for
> that GDF attribute.
>
> - Casey
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nathan,
>>
>> Ah, oops.  Yeah, looks like that slipped under my radar; I don't even
>> remember when Casey added it.  I'll update it, but that should only be
>> considered very coarse-grained information -- the actual version
>> number can be gotten with get_version_stack() or get_yt_version(),
>> both of which are in mods.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Matt,
>> >
>> > I believe Anthony is referring to yt/__init__.py, where version is set
>> > to "2.5-dev" in my copy.
>> >
>> > -Nathan
>> >
>> > On Jan 15, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Matthew Turk wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Anthony,
>> >>
>> >> In the tip of my clone it's set to 3.0 in setup.py.
>> >>
>> >> Also, I have recently merged from yt 2.x but not yet pushed to the
>> >> main repository.  I've been working on "acceptance scripts" here:
>> >>
>> >> https://bitbucket.org/MatthewTurk/yt.acceptance_scripts/
>> >>
>> >> These include links to datasets and checks on the data.  If you get a
>> >> chance, could you add download and testing checks for the polar data
>> >> to it?  I'll push the big merge to the main repository in a few
>> >> minutes.
>> >>
>> >> -Matt
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Nathan Goldbaum
>> >> <nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Hi Anthony,
>> >>>
>> >>> I believe that's an oversight and it should be 3.0-dev - compare to
>> >>> the VERSION variable in the setup script.
>> >>>
>> >>> Matt, can you confirm that?
>> >>>
>> >>> -Nathan
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jan 15, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hello All,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Is there some special reason that the __version__ in yt-3.0 is listed
>> >>>> as '2.5-dev'?  Am I missing something subtle about the release schedule or
>> >>>> is this safe to change?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Be Well
>> >>>> Anthony
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> yt-dev mailing list
>> >>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> >>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> yt-dev mailing list
>> >>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> >>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> yt-dev mailing list
>> >> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > yt-dev mailing list
>> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>



More information about the yt-dev mailing list