[yt-dev] Release 2.5?

[Casey W. Stark]

Just so this is clear, if we are working on development that is not
testing, should we move over to 3.0 now?

- Casey


On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Sam Skillman <samskillman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sounds good to me.  I was actually also holding out a bit to incorporate
> testing into some of the new rendering capabilities anyways.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Sam,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Sam Skillman <samskillman at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > If the release timeframe is end of year, I will put in the alpha channel
>> > rendering, enabling a lot of cool things.  It is already functional in
>> one
>> > of my forks, but it needs to be cleaned up.
>>
>> What if we said instead that we'd release as soon as unit testing is
>> ready and 3.0 is ready for daily use for patch-based AMR, and then if
>> you have time before that point to get the alpha channel in good, but
>> otherwise toss it into 3.0?
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> >
>> > Sam
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Jeff,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:19 PM, j s oishi <jsoishi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Since testing is something that is so high priority for this, and
>> >> > otherwise 2.5 is just a stepping stone to 3.0 (which a *lot* of
>> people
>> >> > are already diving into), maybe we should *only* include testing,
>> >> > unless there are some already done things we could toss in?
>> >> >
>> >> > j
>> >>
>> >> Come to mention it, I *really* like this idea.  Perhaps we should
>> >> identify a threshold for building out the non-core infrastructure
>> >> fixes (i.e., having "pip install yt" work, having a good set of
>> >> testing, etc etc) and then any other fixes or improvements that happen
>> >> along the way are just icing on the cake?  I think having better
>> >> testing should definitely be the focus, particularly as we transition
>> >> the codebase.
>> >>
>> >> -Matt
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Hi all,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We should probably try to get a 2.5 release together by the end of
>> the
>> >> >> year.  It would be really helpful if you are working on something,
>> to
>> >> >> fill it out and target both milestone 2.5 and version 2.5 as an
>> issue.
>> >> >>  That way we can identify goals and push to stable.  Testing should
>> >> >> perhaps be a huge focus of this release.  But, once it's done, I
>> think
>> >> >> we can try to transition to 3.0 for development.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here's the current list, which may need curation a bit as some seem
>> to
>> >> >> be completed or in progress:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/issues?status=new&status=open&milestone=2.5
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you want to subdivide something, create a new milestone and
>> target
>> >> >> *that*, but with *version* 2.5.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Matt
>> >> >>
>> >> >> PS The new bitbucket redesign is quite nice!
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> yt-dev mailing list
>> >> >> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> >> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > yt-dev mailing list
>> >> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> >> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> yt-dev mailing list
>> >> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > yt-dev mailing list
>> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20121009/3834c9f5/attachment.html>