[yt-users] draw_ids

[David Collins]

Also-- Thanks a ton for your time, I appreciate it!

d.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:23 AM, David Collins <dcollins4096 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>> Probably a bug in the way the id labels are generated.
>>
>> Any chance you can share this dataset and file a bug about it? You can
>> upload to a publicly visible url using the new curldrop:
>>
>
> That is a sweet thing.  Here's a set:
>
> http://use.yt/upload/56d3d0a3
>
> FWIW, I'm on yt a7caf0e3ad87, which I think is actually kind of old?  I'll
> try updating as well.  Enzo version is cb9712a1f763, which should be recent.
>
>
> d.
>
>
>
>
>>
>> curl -T filename http://use.yt/upload/
>>
>> Once the upload finishes you'll get a url you can paste in the issue.
>>
>> -Nathan
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> d.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> You could also make a SlicePlot of the grid_indices field and compare
>>>> with the colorbar to see if the ids labels are wrong in the grid callback.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Also what are the slice coordinates and widths of the two SlicePlots
>>>>> in your email?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:32 PM, David Collins <dcollins4096 at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is about what I expected.  So why and or how do I have these two
>>>>>> slices with grid ids that are the same, but clearly not the same grid? The
>>>>>> below shows two slices from the same simulation, but notice that number 169
>>>>>> is a level 2 grid near the center in the first plot, and a level one grid
>>>>>> near the edge in the second plot.  The grid with id =169 is a level 1 grid,
>>>>>> but seems to have RightEdge that's consistent with the center of the center
>>>>>> of the box.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://imgur.com/a/mvCzW
>>>>>>
>>>>>> d.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <
>>>>>>> nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The code for that is here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/src/a7c319c1f87d4b749aa6feb737da504e43a7defb/yt/visualization/plot_modifications.py?at=yt#plot_modifications.py-628
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's coming from the grid_indicies field, which is defined here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/src/a7c319c1f87d4b749aa6feb737da504e43a7defb/yt/fields/geometric_fields.py?at=yt#geometric_fields.py-61
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Due the validators used in that field definition "data" is an
>>>>>>>> AMRGridPatch instance, which is defined in yt/data_objects/grid_patch.py. "
>>>>>>>> data.id" is the grid ID and "data._id_offset" is (as far as I can
>>>>>>>> see) always 1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should only be 1 for Enzo, I think.  The other patch-AMR datasets
>>>>>>> are I think all 0-indexed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Nathan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:58 PM, David Collins <
>>>>>>>> dcollins4096 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi, Everybody--
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to sort out some funny issues with a run, and I'm using
>>>>>>>>> the draw_ids flag to annotate_grids.  I'm noticing that the same IDs are
>>>>>>>>> used in wildly different grids.  Where do the ids used for this flag come
>>>>>>>>> from, and how can I relate them to the grids in index.grids?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> d.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> -- Sent from a computer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> yt-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> yt-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> yt-users mailing list
>>>>>>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -- Sent from a computer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> yt-users mailing list
>>>>>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yt-users mailing list
>>>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -- Sent from a computer.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-users mailing list
>>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-users mailing list
>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -- Sent from a computer.
>



-- 
-- Sent from a computer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-users-spacepope.org/attachments/20150904/2035e432/attachment.htm>