[yt-users] PhasePlot give inconsistent results with different core count and fieldc

Geoffrey So gsiisg at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 11:32:17 PDT 2014


Hi,

Thanks for the quick fix.  My question is did the bug affect anything else
besides PhasePlot (ProjectionPlot, SlicePlot etc)?  My old results using
PlotCollection and add_phase in parallel should be OK right?

From
G.S.


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi again,
>
> The pull request has been accepted.  You can do "yt update" and you should
> be all set.
>
> Britton
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Geoffrey,
>>
>> The operation to combine profile and phase plot data after running in
>> parallel was missing, so what you were seeing was the results from only one
>> of the processors.  I have just filed a pull request to fix this.  Now, I
>> get the same results independent of processor number.  Please. have a look
>> at the PR here<https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-request/782/adding-parallel-support-to-profilend/diff> and
>> test it out if you can.
>>
>> Britton
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Geoffrey,
>>>
>>> Britton and I verified you are correct, there is a problem with the
>>> ProfileND objects not conducting their parallel reduction operation.
>>> A fix is forthcoming.
>>>
>>> -Matt
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Geoffrey So <gsiisg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > The following script gives me different results in the 2d phase plot
>>> when I
>>> > use multiple cores and switch the fieldc parameter.  The results are
>>> > consistent if I only use a single core.  Some of the plots produced
>>> seems
>>> > like it is missing data points or under-sampled, so I'm guessing maybe
>>> not
>>> > all the data from all the cores were collected at the end.
>>> >
>>> > From
>>> > G.S.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> #-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > from yt.mods import *
>>> >
>>> > i=2
>>> > file = "RD%04i" % i
>>> > fn = file+"/"+file
>>> > pf=load(fn)
>>> > dd=pf.h.all_data()
>>> >
>>> > fieldx='Density'
>>> > fieldy='Temperature'
>>> > fieldc='CellVolumeCode'
>>> > #fieldc='CellVolume'
>>> > #fieldc='CellMassMsun'
>>> > #fieldc='CellMass'
>>> > #fieldc='Ones'
>>> >
>>> > pplot = PhasePlot(dd, fieldx, fieldy, [fieldc],weight_field=None)
>>> > pplot.save('example/'+file)
>>> >
>>> #---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > yt-users mailing list
>>> > yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-users mailing list
>>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-users mailing list
> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-users-spacepope.org/attachments/20140331/63430ac9/attachment.htm>


More information about the yt-users mailing list