[yt-users] chemical species abundances discrepancy

[Britton Smith]

It's tough to say since I don't know exactly how you've done these
measurements, but my guess is that it has to due with how the profiles
(assuming you have made profiles) are calculated.  Can you please provide
us with the actual calculations you're doing that are discrepant?


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:14 PM, poetaste at gmail.com <poetaste at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> > I did a simple test with enzo and I tried to plot a radial profile of the
> > chemical species fractions with YT.
> >
> > The problem is that if I use the YT function which intrinsically plot the
> > fraction for a species, let's say H2I_Fraction (as usual), and compare
> this
> > with a direct evaluation of the mass fraction:
> >
> > data['H2I_Density']/data['Density']
> >
> > I obtain some slightly different results, mostly at large radii.
> >
> > Anyone might explain this discrepancy!? This happens with all the
> species.
>
> Without knowing what "data" here is, or how you generated it, it's tough
> to say.
>
> -Matt
>
> >
> > Thank you in advance
> > Stefano_______________________________________________
> > yt-users mailing list
> > yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
> _______________________________________________
> yt-users mailing list
> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-users-spacepope.org/attachments/20140127/2ec5288e/attachment.html>