[yt-users] Problems with PhasePlot.

[Alessandro Ballone]

No problem, thank you for the quick answer and fix!

They were small problems, but, instead of trying to solve them, I thought
it could be much easier for you to find the problem and to provide a
"coherent" solution! And it seems so!

Best regards,

Alessandro

> set_zlim should be working now as well:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-request/658/re-enable-set_zlim/diff
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alessandro,
>>
>> This looks like a bug.  I can reproduce it over here, and I've issued
>> a pull request to fix it.
>>
>>
>> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-request/657/phaseplots-were-transposed
>>
>> I think we'll likely roll a hotfix release as well, for 2.6.1.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Alessandro Ballone <aballone at mpe.mpg.de>
>> wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > I am using yt to analyze my PLUTO simulations and I should say it's a
>> > great analysis and visualization software! Thanks for your great job!
>> >
>> > I'll go now to my problems. I just switched to version 2.6 and I
>> started
>> > using the new "PhasePlot" class. Unfortunately, I get strange results.
>> I
>> > include, at the end of the email, links to plots for 2 simulations
>> with
>> > exactly the same initial conditions and setup, but with different
>> > refinement of my grid.
>> > First of all I suggest to focus on the 2 files highref.png and
>> > righthighref.png. The first one has been made with the "PhasePlot"
>> class,
>> > the second one with the old "PlotCollection" method
>> "add_phase_object".
>> > You can see that the former one is rotated and flipped with respect to
>> the
>> > latter one. I checked my data and the correct plot is the one made
>> with
>> > the "deprecated" method!
>> > Furthermore, if you now compare *highref files to *lowref files, you
>> will
>> > be able to see the 2 different simulations. You can notice that the
>> right*
>> > files look the same, apart from the lower part of the plot, where the
>> > result is different due to numerics in my simulations. The other 2
>> plots
>> > made with PhasePlot (the one without "right" in their names) are
>> instead
>> > inconsistent, with highref being a "stretched" version of lowref.
>> > I am wondering whether this is a problem related to yt's
>> implementation
>> > for PLUTO, but the SlicePlot and ProjectionPlot classes DO work
>> correctly
>> > with it, so I tend to think this is not the case...
>> >
>> > One last thing. The "set_zlim" method does not work because it's not
>> defined!
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance for your answer and thanks again for yt!
>> >
>> > Alessandro
>> >
>> > +++++ IMAGES +++++
>> >
>> > highref: http://i.imgur.com/ZCOqjzV.png
>> >
>> > righthighref: http://i.imgur.com/PSwOIdQ.png
>> >
>> > lowref: http://i.imgur.com/VrSJf3K.png
>> >
>> > highref: http://i.imgur.com/dtLKdXV.png
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > yt-users mailing list
>> > yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-users mailing list
>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-users mailing list
> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>