[yt-users] Hop in parallel?

[Geoffrey So]

That fixed it for me, I get identical haloes now running HOP in serial and
parallel from the 64 cube test dataset.

From
G.S.

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Stephen Skory <s at skory.us> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> I think I've fixed the original HOP problem you had. It's in my yt branch
> here:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/sskory/yt/overview
>
> could you try with the HOP (HaloFinder) with the new changes? Let me
> know, and if it works for you, it will go into the main branch.
>
> With regards to your new problem, I tried the same swap of methods of
> calculating "total_mass" that we did in the HaloFinder, but I think
> there's something screwy going on with  .quantities, and I haven't
> been able to track it down yet.
>
> With regards to speed, in general HaloFinder will be faster on all
> datasets than parallelHF for datasets that HaloFinder can handle. But
> HaloFinder is limited by the size of the dataset and by the cosmology
> of the dataset (small cosmologies mean that a large padding is needed
> when running in parallel, and this will defeat the point of
> parallelism).
>
>
> --
> Stephen Skory
> s at skory.us
> http://stephenskory.com/
> 510.621.3687 (google voice)
> _______________________________________________
> yt-users mailing list
> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-users-spacepope.org/attachments/20120224/353372f3/attachment.html>