[yt-users] Raw data

Matthew Turk matthewturk at gmail.com
Thu Apr 21 07:50:20 PDT 2011


As a brief followup to close the thread, Elizabeth noted on the
enzo-dev mailing list that this was not an issue with yt.

-Matt

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Elizabeth Tasker <taskere at mcmaster.ca> wrote:
> Fabtabulous. Thank you.
>
> Matthew Turk wrote:
>>
>> Hi Elizabeth,
>>
>> _read_data_set reads it directly from the file with no intervention.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Elizabeth Tasker <taskere at mcmaster.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Matt,
>>>
>>> Thanks that's useful but is Total_Energy the raw data or the data once
>>> put
>>> through a unit conversion? The definition of Total_Energy and TotalEnergy
>>> here
>>>
>>> http://yt.enzotools.org/doc/reference/field_list.html#totalenergy
>>>
>>> is a little confused because they are defined with respect to one
>>> another.
>>>
>>> Elizabeth
>>>
>>> PS -- I've not just gone ahead and tried this because it's my student's
>>> data
>>> and he's temporarily vanished. (At least, I hope it's temporary...)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matthew Turk wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Elizabeth,
>>>>
>>>> I believe the only way it could go negative as a result of something
>>>> yt is doing is if it is subtracting off the kinetic energy.  A quick
>>>> way to check this:
>>>>
>>>> http://paste.enzotools.org/show/1582/
>>>>
>>>> Be sure to replace the load command with your dataset.
>>>>
>>>> -Matt
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Elizabeth Tasker <taskere at mcmaster.ca>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible in yt to see the raw energy data? That is the field
>>>>> prior
>>>>> to
>>>>> any unit conversation? I'm seeing odd white areas of oblivion in my
>>>>> simulation (see attached picture) that seem to be where the total
>>>>> energy
>>>>> goes negative. I strongly suspect this happens sometime during the yt
>>>>> analysis, rather than the raw Enzo data (since the simulation doesn't
>>>>> crash
>>>>> the MSCL scheme), but I want to be totally sure.
>>>>>
>>>>> Elizabeth
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> yt-users mailing list
>>>>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yt-users mailing list
>>>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-users mailing list
>>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-users mailing list
>> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-users mailing list
> yt-users at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-users-spacepope.org
>



More information about the yt-users mailing list