<div dir="ltr">simulation type (N-body, hydro, possibly hydro parameters)<div>unit information maybe? domain edges without knowing length units might not be useful</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Matthew Turk <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthewturk@gmail.com" target="_blank">matthewturk@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi all,<br>
<br>
In this PR I've tried to instigate a discussion of what would be<br>
useful for a coarse-grained index of datasets:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/1902/rfc-yt-search-command" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/1902/rfc-yt-search-command</a><br>
<br>
For the "minimum representation" object, we use:<br>
<br>
("dimensionality", "refine_by", "domain_dimensions", "current_time",<br>
"domain_left_edge", "domain_right_edge", "unique_identifier",<br>
"current_redshift", "output_hash", "cosmological_simulation",<br>
"omega_matter", "omega_lambda", "hubble_constant", "name")<br>
<br>
Is this sufficient, or should we add/remove things?  We likely want to<br>
remove the cosmological ones from non-cosmo sims (and leave them in<br>
for cosmo sims) but otherwise, is there anything else we should<br>
include?<br>
<br>
-Matt<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
yt-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org">yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>