<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jan 4, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Cameron Hummels <<a href="mailto:chummels@gmail.com" class="">chummels@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I've seen a lot of PRs get merged in the last few days. So I guess we're gearing up for a 3.1 release? What is the plan for its release? </div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">Whatever plan we had for the release back at the beginning of January has essentially been shelved because we had the issues with the doc builds and a number of bug fixes have come up. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I think we’re in a good position to let things settle out now, but there is the issue of Nathan’s PR:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-request/1381/particle-position-and-velocity-fields-for" class="">https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-request/1381/particle-position-and-velocity-fields-for</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Nathan, previously you mentioned that this was a blocker for 3.1, but I also see in its description that it depends on the WIP PR #1377:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-request/1377/wip-rfc-add-a-convenience-method-to-create/" class="">https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-request/1377/wip-rfc-add-a-convenience-method-to-create/</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">so unless we are prepared to vet both of these and pull them in, I think that we should have a freeze now (or very soon). </div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>