<div dir="ltr">I've spitballed a short outline based on the content of the abstract.<div><br></div><div>I think it still needs to be fleshed out, but this should be a good start. Sam, Matt, Doug, and anyone else that would like to contribute but haven't chimed in yet, please take a look at the google doc and edit the outline as you see fit.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Nathan</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Matthew Turk <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthewturk@gmail.com" target="_blank">matthewturk@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Nathan,<br>
<br>
Interesting. I was under the impression (from Anthony) this was a<br>
possible thing. I'll write to the organizers' list and ask.<br>
<br>
I think a detailed abstract is a good idea. We can start by fleshing<br>
out what's already in the abstract.<br>
<br>
-Matt<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <<a href="mailto:nathan12343@gmail.com">nathan12343@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi all,<br>
><br>
> So there seems to be two issues with submitting our abstract.<br>
><br>
> First, there doesn't seem to be a way to add additional authors to the<br>
> abstract. Matt, I think you're on the organizing committee for the<br>
> conference - is it appropriate for us to be submitting a talk with<br>
> more than one speaker? How do I indicate that on the abstract<br>
> submission form.<br>
><br>
> Second, in addition to the abstract, which we've already written,<br>
> there needs to be a "Detailed Abstract" -- the form indicates this<br>
> should be an outline for the talk -- which will not be printed in the<br>
> program but will be made public on the conference website. We'll need<br>
> to collectively write this before we can submit our talk for<br>
> consideration.<br>
><br>
> -Nathan<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nathan Goldbaum <<a href="mailto:nathan12343@gmail.com">nathan12343@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Hi Matt,<br>
>><br>
>> I'll take care of it!<br>
>><br>
>> -Nathan<br>
>><br>
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Matthew Turk <<a href="mailto:matthewturk@gmail.com">matthewturk@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> Hi all,<br>
>>><br>
>>> I submitted the sprint. Anyone else want to take a crack at the<br>
>>> abstract for the talk?<br>
>>><br>
>>> -Matt<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Matthew Turk <<a href="mailto:matthewturk@gmail.com">matthewturk@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <<a href="mailto:nathan12343@gmail.com">nathan12343@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>> Hi Matt,<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Like I mentioned in the last e-mail thread, I'm interested in going to<br>
>>>>> scipy. I had in mind taking more of a leadership role for a yt talk,<br>
>>>>> if only so I can get my name and face out there a bit more prominently<br>
>>>>> as I get ready to apply for jobs.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> I think that's a great idea. As I noted ... "I do not have any<br>
>>>> particular interest in acting as the primary presenter." :) I think<br>
>>>> we should divide it up between people that are attending.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Would you be interested in having more input from me on the abstract?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Yes.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> Right now it's mostly focused on things in your wheelhouse.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Alternatively I'd be happy to submit a separate abstract if you think<br>
>>>>> that would be best.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> It's up to you, but I'm moderately -1 on that.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> -Nathan<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Matthew Turk <<a href="mailto:matthewturk@gmail.com">matthewturk@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> The (nominal) due date for submissions for SciPy2014 is next Friday:<br>
>>>>>> <a href="https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/" target="_blank">https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/</a> . I think we should aim to<br>
>>>>>> have a strong presence there -- I've heard from a couple people they<br>
>>>>>> plan to be there, which is *awesome*. For various reasons, I am only<br>
>>>>>> going to be traveling to the yt workshop in Santa Cruz and SciPy for a<br>
>>>>>> little while, so I am planning to be there the entire duration. There<br>
>>>>>> are a few things I think we should consider:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> * A joint talk introducing yt 3.0, where everyone in attendance<br>
>>>>>> either participates in the talk or acts as ambassadors. I want this<br>
>>>>>> to be submitted to the general track. I do not have any particular<br>
>>>>>> interest in acting as the primary presenter.<br>
>>>>>> * Sprints! For sure.<br>
>>>>>> * Possibly a talk submitted to the astro track about domain-specific<br>
>>>>>> stuff, like Hilary's spectrum generator, or John's Chandra generator,<br>
>>>>>> or the integration with Rockstar, or even AGORA.<br>
>>>>>> * We should participate in the WSSSPE workshop, which will be on<br>
>>>>>> Thursday afternoon. Looks like right now I'll be co-chairing this.<br>
>>>>>> * We may consider submitting a poster in addition, which emphasizes<br>
>>>>>> things like outreach using yt.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Here are my drafts of the sprint and talk abstracts. You should be<br>
>>>>>> able to provide comments on them by right-clicking. If you want<br>
>>>>>> direct edit privs, let me know.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/15BakPzOLdN6IIjx3jDFyD4Jg01ing1uQ9nIgKFy--7k/edit" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/15BakPzOLdN6IIjx3jDFyD4Jg01ing1uQ9nIgKFy--7k/edit</a><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Options I think we should pass on:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> * yt-centric tutorial: we will get to the point that I think this is<br>
>>>>>> a good idea, but I don't think we'd get enough people signing up for<br>
>>>>>> it.<br>
>>>>>> * yt-BOF. It might be worthwhile to consider setting up a BOF for<br>
>>>>>> data analysis of spatial data, though. (Not just GIS.)<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> I will be submitting a talk about ZeroPy as well.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> -Matt<br>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list<br>
>>>>>> <a href="mailto:yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org">yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org</a><br>
>>>>>> <a href="http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org" target="_blank">http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org</a><br>
>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>>> yt-dev mailing list<br>
>>>>> <a href="mailto:yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org">yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org</a><br>
>>>>> <a href="http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org" target="_blank">http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org</a><br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> yt-dev mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org">yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org" target="_blank">http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> yt-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org">yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org" target="_blank">http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
yt-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org">yt-dev@lists.spacepope.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org" target="_blank">http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>