[yt-dev] SPH Smoothing Formulation?
Cameron Hummels
chummels at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 11:07:32 PDT 2016
Thanks, Matt and Molly. Very excited to see the kd-tree formulation that
Meagan has implemented. A couple additional questions:
* Using the chosen SPH kernel (thanks to Bili Dong, we now have cubic,
> quartic, quintic, wendland2, wendland4, and wendland6), the smoothing is
> conducted on each cell by looking at all the nearest particles. This is
> implemented in the process function on the class VolumeWeightedSmooth in
> yt/geometry/particle_smooth.pyx
>
> What is the default SPH kernel that is used for deposition? Is it
frontend specific (and if so, where is it defined for each frontend), or do
we just use a cubic spline as default?
Also, what value is used for the smoothing length of the particle
deposition? I believe most codes already have a smoothing_length field
defined by the simulation. Looking in VolumeWeightedSmooth, it seems to
accept a smoothing_length field for the particles but I don't know if this
is the simulation-defined field. I may be wrong, but it seems to me that
using the simulation-defined smoothing_length field is only applicable for
the "scatter" deposition method. I thought "gather" recalculates new
smoothing lengths to address the fact that you may try to sample the fluid
quantities a large distance away from the nearest particles, who all may
have small smoothing lengths because of their proximity to each other. But
I may be mixed up here.
Cameron
--
Cameron Hummels
NSF Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Astronomy
California Institute of Technology
http://chummels.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20160908/ec6da9b3/attachment.html>
More information about the yt-dev
mailing list