[yt-dev] Differences between .frb and Pixelize

[Matthew Turk]

Great, thanks.

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds good to me!
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all, especially Nathan and Cameron,
>>>
>>> In the plot callbacks, there are a few (quiver / cutting quiver,
>>> streamline, and clump contour) where we call [C]Pixelize directly.
>>>
>>> If we're specifying a skip parameter, that reduces the resolution and
>>> I can see why we do it.  But is there a good reason, if skip is set to
>>> do every value, why we wouldn't use the plot.frb object itself?
>>>
>>
>> Those calls to CPixelize predate the PlotWindow infrastructure in the .frb
>> attribute.
>>
>> If you can get rid of them, I say go for it.
>>
>>>
>>> -Matt
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cameron Hummels
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Steward Observatory
> University of Arizona
> http://chummels.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
_______________________________________________
yt-dev mailing list
yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org