[yt-dev] VR refactor status update

Matthew Turk matthewturk at gmail.com
Wed Jun 10 14:37:22 PDT 2015


Here's the script!

http://paste.yt-project.org/show/5623/

I'm hoping to make it into a cookbook recipe.

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Kacper Kowalik <xarthisius.kk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/09/2015 01:40 PM, Matthew Turk wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Returning to this thread a week later.  Suoqing has updated a few of
>> the cameras, and I've written a bunch of documentation.  A few of us
>> have also tested out some of the new capabilities, and while they
>> aren't without some flaws, I think they're pretty darn solid at this
>> point.  I broke one of Suoqing's open PRs to Sam's repo, which I
>> intend to fix, but I think that at least from a documentation
>> perspective this PR is ready to review:
>>
>> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-request/1256/wip-volume-rendering-refactor
>>
>> Comments on documentation would be extremely appreciated.
>
> Hi,
> FTR pre-built docs are available at:
>
> http://hub.yt:8080/job/yt_docs/50/artifact/sandbox/doc/build/html/index.html
>
> There's also a neat, 360deg movie based on Nathan's simulation, that
> Matt made using new VR framework:
>
> https://youtu.be/T9kRtgHFG9I
>
> Cheers,
> Kacper
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Andrew, Kacper, Allyson and I had a hangout to go over the current
>>> state of the VR refactor that Sam started.
>>>
>>> Where we're at:
>>>
>>>  * Docs need to be written and updated.  I have committed to taking
>>> this on, and I am starting today.
>>>  * There are two cameras that need to be ported, the setreo spherical
>>> camera and the perspective camera.  Suoqing, is there any chance you
>>> might be able to take a look at doing this, and issuing a PR to Sam's
>>> repository?  I ask only because you've been so good at camera porting
>>> in the past.  :)
>>>
>>> Once that's done, since there is a backwards-compatible camera
>>> interface, I assert that we should consider heavily simply pulling in
>>> the code and beginning to migrate.
>>>
>>> -Matt
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>



More information about the yt-dev mailing list