[yt-dev] What would be useful for coarse-grained indexing?

Nathan Goldbaum nathan12343 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 10 13:53:31 PST 2015


simulation type (N-body, hydro, possibly hydro parameters)
unit information maybe? domain edges without knowing length units might not
be useful


On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> In this PR I've tried to instigate a discussion of what would be
> useful for a coarse-grained index of datasets:
>
>
> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-requests/1902/rfc-yt-search-command
>
> For the "minimum representation" object, we use:
>
> ("dimensionality", "refine_by", "domain_dimensions", "current_time",
> "domain_left_edge", "domain_right_edge", "unique_identifier",
> "current_redshift", "output_hash", "cosmological_simulation",
> "omega_matter", "omega_lambda", "hubble_constant", "name")
>
> Is this sufficient, or should we add/remove things?  We likely want to
> remove the cosmological ones from non-cosmo sims (and leave them in
> for cosmo sims) but otherwise, is there anything else we should
> include?
>
> -Matt
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20151210/d0274ad0/attachment.htm>


More information about the yt-dev mailing list