[yt-dev] yt 3.1?

Britton Smith brittonsmith at gmail.com
Fri Oct 31 10:58:42 PDT 2014


I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.  To be clear, I'm talking
about merging devel into stable, doing the 3.1 release, and then pulling
the new VR into devel.  Is this different from what you envision?

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sounds good, but I worry that anyone tracking devel at that point might
> get surprised.  The way hg handles this is that they by default commit to
> stable, and then merge from devel during the release period.  I don't know
> that we have that kind of discipline or rigor to our process, but it would
> help with things if we knew all bugfixes were already oin stable.
>
>
> On Fri Oct 31 2014 at 12:42:36 PM Britton Smith <brittonsmith at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm ok with releasing 3.1 with what's in it now and any last PRs people
>> want to get in.  Maybe the best thing would be to then pull in the new
>> volume renderer immediately afterward with an announcement to yt-users.
>> Then, the time between 3.1 and 3.2 can be used to shake out any remaining
>> issues.
>>
>> Britton
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:55 AM, John ZuHone <jzuhone at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So where do we stand on 3.1?
>>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2014, at 1:10 PM, John ZuHone <jzuhone at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I understand your reservations. Maybe we should wait for 3.2 for the VR
>>> release. It sounds like we should put it through the paces.
>>>
>>> Any chance anyone can push the button on the equivalence and particle
>>> generator PRs? I need to narrow things down on the FITS one still.
>>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:47 AM, John ZuHone <jzuhone at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We’re due for a 3.0.3 soon, so it sounds like that’s what we should do.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should we?
>>>
>>> I worry about releasing new features in a "bugfix" release.
>>>
>>> Can we call the VR release yt 3.2?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’d like to see my 3 PRs pulled in as well as Doug’s compose PR. Are
>>>> there any others folks want to advocate for?
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:45 AM, Michael Zingale <
>>>> michael.zingale at stonybrook.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Once the new VR is pulled in, we should have a month or so of shaking
>>>> out before a public release.  This way we can all try our favorite scripts
>>>> and give feedback, etc.  We want VR to continue to work in the new release
>>>> (API changes are fine).  I'm happy to do what I can to test things out when
>>>> the time is right.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, then we shouldn't call it 3.1, I think.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue Oct 28 2014 at 8:19:38 PM Cameron Hummels <chummels at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm good with this.  I'm personally anxious about pushing the VR out
>>>>>> right now, because there may be some API mods as the VR goes towards
>>>>>> including movie stuff.  My concern is that if we push the new VR module
>>>>>> into the public, people will use it and modifying the API will be very hard
>>>>>> at that point because it will then break people's code.  The movie VR stuff
>>>>>> is something I was going to begin working on once the static frame VR stuff
>>>>>> was more set, which is what we're working on now.  I figured timeframe for
>>>>>> both to be done was end of January, but Sam may have different ideas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cameron
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Britton Smith <
>>>>>> brittonsmith at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds good to me, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me.  I think we were due anyway.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sam, what do you think the chances of getting the VR PR landed are?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue Oct 28 2014 at 4:26:22 PM Nathan Goldbaum <
>>>>>>>> nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There have been a number of cool new features in the pull request
>>>>>>>>> queue recently. Some of these have added new features and I think it might
>>>>>>>>> be worthwhile to indicate that by bumping the minor version number on the
>>>>>>>>> next release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think it would be a good idea to try to integrate the open PRs
>>>>>>>>> as well as any that come in over the next couple of weeks that can be
>>>>>>>>> reviewed, call it yt 3.1 and release on or around Dec. 1. This
>>>>>>>>> will mean generating a proofread docs build and perhaps a few days of
>>>>>>>>> low-hanging issue triaging.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd nominate John ZuHone to send out the release email to
>>>>>>>>> recognize the hard work he's been putting in recently.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just an idea, but I've tried to include specifics as a basis for
>>>>>>>>> further discussion.  What do you all think?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nathan
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cameron Hummels
>>>>>> Postdoctoral Researcher
>>>>>> Steward Observatory
>>>>>> University of Arizona
>>>>>> http://chummels.org
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Zingale
>>>> Associate Professor
>>>>
>>>> Dept. of Physics & Astronomy • Stony Brook University • Stony Brook, NY
>>>> 11794-3800
>>>> *phone*:  631-632-8225
>>>> *e-mail*: Michael.Zingale at stonybrook.edu
>>>> *web*: http://www.astro.sunysb.edu/mzingale
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20141031/f231e759/attachment.html>


More information about the yt-dev mailing list