[yt-dev] yt 3.1?

[Michael Zingale]

Once the new VR is pulled in, we should have a month or so of shaking out
before a public release.  This way we can all try our favorite scripts and
give feedback, etc.  We want VR to continue to work in the new release (API
changes are fine).  I'm happy to do what I can to test things out when the
time is right.

Mike

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, then we shouldn't call it 3.1, I think.
>
>
> On Tue Oct 28 2014 at 8:19:38 PM Cameron Hummels <chummels at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm good with this.  I'm personally anxious about pushing the VR out
>> right now, because there may be some API mods as the VR goes towards
>> including movie stuff.  My concern is that if we push the new VR module
>> into the public, people will use it and modifying the API will be very hard
>> at that point because it will then break people's code.  The movie VR stuff
>> is something I was going to begin working on once the static frame VR stuff
>> was more set, which is what we're working on now.  I figured timeframe for
>> both to be done was end of January, but Sam may have different ideas.
>>
>> Cameron
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds good to me, too.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sounds good to me.  I think we were due anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Sam, what do you think the chances of getting the VR PR landed are?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue Oct 28 2014 at 4:26:22 PM Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> There have been a number of cool new features in the pull request
>>>>> queue recently. Some of these have added new features and I think it might
>>>>> be worthwhile to indicate that by bumping the minor version number on the
>>>>> next release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it would be a good idea to try to integrate the open PRs as
>>>>> well as any that come in over the next couple of weeks that can be reviewed,
>>>>> call it yt 3.1 and release on or around Dec. 1. This will mean generating a
>>>>> proofread docs build and perhaps a few days of low-hanging issue triaging.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd nominate John ZuHone to send out the release email to recognize
>>>>> the hard work he's been putting in recently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just an idea, but I've tried to include specifics as a basis for
>>>>> further discussion.  What do you all think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nathan
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cameron Hummels
>> Postdoctoral Researcher
>> Steward Observatory
>> University of Arizona
>> http://chummels.org
>>  _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>


-- 
Michael Zingale
Associate Professor

Dept. of Physics & Astronomy • Stony Brook University • Stony Brook, NY
11794-3800
*phone*:  631-632-8225
*e-mail*: Michael.Zingale at stonybrook.edu
*web*: http://www.astro.sunysb.edu/mzingale
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20141029/24daa8f8/attachment.html>