[yt-dev] yt 3.1?

Nathan Goldbaum nathan12343 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 3 10:05:32 PST 2014


1288 is ready.

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Myers <atmyers2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> #1252 is ready, but also needs the tests to be updated.
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Which PRs are ready to go and should be put in before the 3.1 release?  I
>> am okay with us putting out 3.1, and then aiming for VR at 3.2.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>>
>> On Fri Oct 31 2014 at 9:56:04 AM John ZuHone <jzuhone at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So where do we stand on 3.1?
>>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2014, at 1:10 PM, John ZuHone <jzuhone at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I understand your reservations. Maybe we should wait for 3.2 for the VR
>>> release. It sounds like we should put it through the paces.
>>>
>>> Any chance anyone can push the button on the equivalence and particle
>>> generator PRs? I need to narrow things down on the FITS one still.
>>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:47 AM, John ZuHone <jzuhone at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We’re due for a 3.0.3 soon, so it sounds like that’s what we should do.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should we?
>>>
>>> I worry about releasing new features in a "bugfix" release.
>>>
>>> Can we call the VR release yt 3.2?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’d like to see my 3 PRs pulled in as well as Doug’s compose PR. Are
>>>> there any others folks want to advocate for?
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:45 AM, Michael Zingale <
>>>> michael.zingale at stonybrook.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Once the new VR is pulled in, we should have a month or so of shaking
>>>> out before a public release.  This way we can all try our favorite scripts
>>>> and give feedback, etc.  We want VR to continue to work in the new release
>>>> (API changes are fine).  I'm happy to do what I can to test things out when
>>>> the time is right.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, then we shouldn't call it 3.1, I think.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue Oct 28 2014 at 8:19:38 PM Cameron Hummels <chummels at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm good with this.  I'm personally anxious about pushing the VR out
>>>>>> right now, because there may be some API mods as the VR goes towards
>>>>>> including movie stuff.  My concern is that if we push the new VR module
>>>>>> into the public, people will use it and modifying the API will be very hard
>>>>>> at that point because it will then break people's code.  The movie VR stuff
>>>>>> is something I was going to begin working on once the static frame VR stuff
>>>>>> was more set, which is what we're working on now.  I figured timeframe for
>>>>>> both to be done was end of January, but Sam may have different ideas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cameron
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Britton Smith <
>>>>>> brittonsmith at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds good to me, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me.  I think we were due anyway.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sam, what do you think the chances of getting the VR PR landed are?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue Oct 28 2014 at 4:26:22 PM Nathan Goldbaum <
>>>>>>>> nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There have been a number of cool new features in the pull request
>>>>>>>>> queue recently. Some of these have added new features and I think it might
>>>>>>>>> be worthwhile to indicate that by bumping the minor version number on the
>>>>>>>>> next release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think it would be a good idea to try to integrate the open PRs
>>>>>>>>> as well as any that come in over the next couple of weeks that can be
>>>>>>>>> reviewed, call it yt 3.1 and release on or around Dec. 1. This
>>>>>>>>> will mean generating a proofread docs build and perhaps a few days of
>>>>>>>>> low-hanging issue triaging.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd nominate John ZuHone to send out the release email to
>>>>>>>>> recognize the hard work he's been putting in recently.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just an idea, but I've tried to include specifics as a basis for
>>>>>>>>> further discussion.  What do you all think?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nathan
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cameron Hummels
>>>>>> Postdoctoral Researcher
>>>>>> Steward Observatory
>>>>>> University of Arizona
>>>>>> http://chummels.org
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Zingale
>>>> Associate Professor
>>>>
>>>> Dept. of Physics & Astronomy • Stony Brook University • Stony Brook, NY
>>>> 11794-3800
>>>> *phone*:  631-632-8225
>>>> *e-mail*: Michael.Zingale at stonybrook.edu
>>>> *web*: http://www.astro.sunysb.edu/mzingale
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20141103/526d139a/attachment.htm>


More information about the yt-dev mailing list