[yt-dev] Should we remove plot collection before 3.0?

[Geoffrey So]

"Most or even *all* of the docs have removed plot collection"

Yeah I noticed it gone from the cookbooks etc, but when I did a search for
'plotcollection' I can still find the API references etc, but that's
probably because the doc is 2.X not 3.0.

From
G.S.


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Geoffrey,
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Geoffrey So <gsiisg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > +0.5
> >
> > This means I'll have to do some scripts update.
> > We should remove it from the docs as well or new comers might start
> asking
> > questions about it.
>
> Most or even *all* of the docs have removed plot collection, so I
> think we're getting there on that front.  And, despite my poorly
> worded subject, I am proposing we remove it from *3.0* before
> releasing 3.0.  So if you continue to use the 2.X branch, which will
> not really go away for some time, you should be okay.  But yes, I
> think education is a huge component of this -- and something we need
> to ensure we address across the board.
>
> -Matt
>
> >
> > From
> > G.S.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Okay, enough voting, here's the YTEP PR:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/ytep/pull-request/35/adding-ytep-0020-removing-plotcollection/diff
> >>
> >> Please comment or approve there.  I suspect we will approve this quite
> >> easily.
> >>
> >> -Matt
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Brian O'Shea <bwoshea at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm inclined to remove plot collection before yt 3.0 is released.
> >> >> PhasePlot and ProfilePlot both work in 2.6, and we've actually seen
> >> >> quite a bit of migration to them.
> >> >>
> >> >> If there's enough support, I'll bring this to a YTEP and we can hash
> >> >> it out there, but before I went to that point I figured I'd look for
> a
> >> >> handful of +1's here.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Matt
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> yt-dev mailing list
> >> >> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > yt-dev mailing list
> >> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> yt-dev mailing list
> >> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > yt-dev mailing list
> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20140318/8269b3cc/attachment.html>