[yt-dev] SciPy abstract submission

Nathan Goldbaum nathan12343 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 14 10:33:43 PDT 2014 

The abstract is now submitted.


On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Douglas Harvey Rudd
> <drudd at uchicago.edu> wrote:
> > I agree to drop the last sentence as well, it's not terribly clear, and
> ending on petabytes and
> > tens of thousands of cores gives it a nice punch.
> >
> > How long is the presentation?  I'd worry about too many changes of
> ambassadors taking up
> > too much time.
>
> 30 minutes -- and I agree, but regardless of what we end up doing
> during the talk, I think everybody in attendance ought to be listed on
> the author list.  :)
>
> >
> > Douglas Rudd
> > Scientific Computing Consultant
> > Research Computing Center
> > drudd at uchicago.edu
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 14, 2014, at 8:11 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Nathan, please feel free to submit the abstract, but could you please
> >> (in the additional notes section) include the author list?  You might
> >> also mention in the notes that we're hoping to split up the
> >> presentation and additionally have "ambassadors" or something that
> >> will be there to talk to people about data, etc etc.  The abstract may
> >> also be too long.  If so, I say cut the last sentence, and whatever
> >> else, but try to keep some of the important stuff like non-astro,
> >> units, 3.0, and the scientific python ecosystem bit.  The detailed
> >> abstract can include the entire current abstract.  Also, I think it
> >> should be submitted to the general track, and not one of the domain
> >> symposia.
> >>
> >> -Matt
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> I've spitballed a short outline based on the content of the abstract.
> >>>
> >>> I think it still needs to be fleshed out, but this should be a good
> start.
> >>> Sam, Matt, Doug, and anyone else that would like to contribute but
> haven't
> >>> chimed in yet, please take a look at the google doc and edit the
> outline as
> >>> you see fit.
> >>>
> >>> -Nathan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Nathan,
> >>>>
> >>>> Interesting.  I was under the impression (from Anthony) this was a
> >>>> possible thing.  I'll write to the organizers' list and ask.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think a detailed abstract is a good idea.  We can start by fleshing
> >>>> out what's already in the abstract.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Matt
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <
> nathan12343 at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So there seems to be two issues with submitting our abstract.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> First, there doesn't seem to be a way to add additional authors to
> the
> >>>>> abstract.  Matt, I think you're on the organizing committee for the
> >>>>> conference - is it appropriate for us to be submitting a talk with
> >>>>> more than one speaker?  How do I indicate that on the abstract
> >>>>> submission form.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Second, in addition to the abstract, which we've already written,
> >>>>> there needs to be a "Detailed Abstract" -- the form indicates this
> >>>>> should be an outline for the talk -- which will not be printed in the
> >>>>> program but will be made public on the conference website.  We'll
> need
> >>>>> to collectively write this before we can submit our talk for
> >>>>> consideration.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Nathan
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nathan Goldbaum
> >>>>> <nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Matt,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll take care of it!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Nathan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Matthew Turk <
> matthewturk at gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I submitted the sprint.  Anyone else want to take a crack at the
> >>>>>>> abstract for the talk?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Matt
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Matthew Turk <
> matthewturk at gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Nathan Goldbaum
> >>>>>>>> <nathan12343 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Matt,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Like I mentioned in the last e-mail thread, I'm interested in
> going
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> scipy.  I had in mind taking more of a leadership role for a yt
> >>>>>>>>> talk,
> >>>>>>>>> if only so I can get my name and face out there a bit more
> >>>>>>>>> prominently
> >>>>>>>>> as I get ready to apply for jobs.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I think that's a great idea.  As I noted ... "I do not have any
> >>>>>>>> particular interest in acting as the primary presenter."  :)  I
> think
> >>>>>>>> we should divide it up between people that are attending.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Would you be interested in having more input from me on the
> >>>>>>>>> abstract?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Right now it's mostly focused on things in your wheelhouse.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Alternatively I'd be happy to submit a separate abstract if you
> >>>>>>>>> think
> >>>>>>>>> that would be best.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's up to you, but I'm moderately -1 on that.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -Nathan
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Matthew Turk <
> matthewturk at gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The (nominal) due date for submissions for SciPy2014 is next
> >>>>>>>>>> Friday:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/ .  I think we should
> aim to
> >>>>>>>>>> have a strong presence there -- I've heard from a couple people
> >>>>>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>> plan to be there, which is *awesome*.  For various reasons, I am
> >>>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>> going to be traveling to the yt workshop in Santa Cruz and SciPy
> >>>>>>>>>> for a
> >>>>>>>>>> little while, so I am planning to be there the entire duration.
> >>>>>>>>>> There
> >>>>>>>>>> are a few things I think we should consider:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> * A joint talk introducing yt 3.0, where everyone in attendance
> >>>>>>>>>> either participates in the talk or acts as ambassadors.  I want
> >>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>> to be submitted to the general track.  I do not have any
> particular
> >>>>>>>>>> interest in acting as the primary presenter.
> >>>>>>>>>> * Sprints!  For sure.
> >>>>>>>>>> * Possibly a talk submitted to the astro track about
> >>>>>>>>>> domain-specific
> >>>>>>>>>> stuff, like Hilary's spectrum generator, or John's Chandra
> >>>>>>>>>> generator,
> >>>>>>>>>> or the integration with Rockstar, or even AGORA.
> >>>>>>>>>> * We should participate in the WSSSPE workshop, which will be on
> >>>>>>>>>> Thursday afternoon.  Looks like right now I'll be co-chairing
> this.
> >>>>>>>>>> * We may consider submitting a poster in addition, which
> >>>>>>>>>> emphasizes
> >>>>>>>>>> things like outreach using yt.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Here are my drafts of the sprint and talk abstracts.  You
> should be
> >>>>>>>>>> able to provide comments on them by right-clicking.  If you want
> >>>>>>>>>> direct edit privs, let me know.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/15BakPzOLdN6IIjx3jDFyD4Jg01ing1uQ9nIgKFy--7k/edit
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Options I think we should pass on:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> * yt-centric tutorial: we will get to the point that I think
> this
> >>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> a good idea, but I don't think we'd get enough people signing up
> >>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>> * yt-BOF.  It might be worthwhile to consider setting up a BOF
> for
> >>>>>>>>>> data analysis of spatial data, though.  (Not just GIS.)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I will be submitting a talk about ZeroPy as well.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -Matt
> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>>>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>>>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>>>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> yt-dev mailing list
> >> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > yt-dev mailing list
> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20140314/10564774/attachment.html>

More information about the yt-dev mailing list