[yt-dev] Globally replacing pf with ds?

Nathan Goldbaum nathan12343 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 18 23:12:28 PDT 2014


This is ready now and passes all of the unit and answer tests:

https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/pull-request/954/replacing-pf-with-ds/diff#chg-doc/docstring_idioms.txt

Should we wait to merge this in until we can cut down on the PR backlog?


On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:

> We usually use "convert-repo" for this purpose.
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Sam Skillman <samskillman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +1, as it is in line with
> > http://ytep.readthedocs.org/en/latest/YTEPs/YTEP-0017.html. Perhaps use
> a
> > different username like 'rename-pf' or something so that hg blame is
> useful
> > for figuring out what was the cause? Also this should probably be done
> at a
> > point when the number of open PRs is low.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 since this will provide consistency with docs and make more sense for
> >> new users.  I support doing this asap so that any bugs can be dealt with
> >> prior to release.
> >>
> >> Cameron
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Stuart Mumford <stuart at mumford.me.uk>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1 fwiw
> >>>
> >>> Stuart
> >>>
> >>> On 11 Jun 2014 22:55, "John ZuHone" <jzuhone at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 for me.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 11, 2014, at 5:53 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Hi all,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Before 3.0 goes out, how do you all feel about a PR that replaces
> "pf"
> >>>> > with "ds" across the whole codebase?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I think this is worth doing, since it reduces the cognitive load of
> >>>> > dealing with yt internals.  One downside is that it will break user
> scripts
> >>>> > if they're using internal APIs.  It will also be a big,
> difficult-to-review
> >>>> > PR.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Now is the time to do this if it ever gets done since there are a
> >>>> > large number of other breaking changes in 3.0.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I'd be happy to do this if there's a consensus that it's worth
> doing.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Nathan
> >>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>> > yt-dev mailing list
> >>>> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>>> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cameron Hummels
> >> Postdoctoral Researcher
> >> Steward Observatory
> >> University of Arizona
> >> http://chummels.org
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> yt-dev mailing list
> >> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > yt-dev mailing list
> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20140618/40e13b2e/attachment.htm>


More information about the yt-dev mailing list