[yt-dev] Regression for particle deposition
Desika Narayanan
dnarayan at haverford.edu
Sat Jun 14 13:59:02 PDT 2014
Hey Matt,
Thanks - does this mean that any commit after the 2dc75b72d271 would have
the regressed octree deposition, or that updating to changesets after that
means we see the 'new' octree particle deposition.
-desika
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As a quick note, on my laptop I found a regression in particle
> deposition. The snapshot_033 ("deposit","all_density") is messed up.
> It was my fault, as it came from changeset 2dc75b72d271 and is a
> result of F/C ordering (and I can fix as soon as I am back at my desk
> in an hour or so). Should only affect octree particle deposition,
> went in very briefly, and I've CC'd everyone who might have been
> affected in the last two days.
>
> But, to the point, I'm not sure why the answer testing didn't catch
> this. Kacper, any ideas?
>
> -Matt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20140614/f3cc0e0a/attachment.htm>
More information about the yt-dev
mailing list