[yt-dev] Status of sunrise exporter, radmc, and two point functions for 3.0 release?

[Matthew Turk]

Instead of removing the docs, please just unlink them from the contents.

-Matt
On Jul 23, 2014 9:40 PM, "Cameron Hummels" <chummels at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that if we actually plan to port these over in a similar format to
> what we have, then sure, we can leave them.  You're right that we should
> get rid of the docs on them if they don't work.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I know that we want to port them, but since they will likely not be
>> updated before we release, should we remove the sections on these analysis
>> modules from the 3.0 docs?
>>
>> No need to completely remove them from the code, I don't think, so long
>> as we don't advertise them as working in the docs.
>>
>> -Nathan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cameron Hummels
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Steward Observatory
> University of Arizona
> http://chummels.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20140723/7e28c9be/attachment.htm>