[yt-dev] halo merger tree in yt-3.0

Cameron Hummels chummels at gmail.com
Tue Jul 22 16:03:20 PDT 2014


I say we go with 1.  We could do 2, but it doesn't seem worth it.  As long
as the documentation reflects that there is no halo merger tree, it should
be OK.  I for one need to get it working soon, so I'm invested in working
with others on this project to get it done in 3.0.  I don't think we should
try to port the old stuff, just redesign using the new framework.

Cameron


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I want to address the state of halo merger trees in yt-3.0.  As it stands,
> one cannot use yt-3.0 to create a merger tree.  The two existing methods
> have not been ported over from yt-2.x and now rely on functionality that
> has seen significant changes.  For example, the old HaloProfiler has been
> removed, and the outputs of all yt halo finders have been redesigned to
> work with the new halo_analysis framework discussed in YTEP-0012.  Both of
> these changes break one or both of the current merger trees.  Thus, it will
> take significant work to make them functional within yt-3.0.  In addition,
> the aim has been to design a new merger tree that would work with the
> halo_analysis framework (discussed as HaloCatalogTimeSeries in the YTEP).
>
> In summary, unless there is someone willing to champion them, I believe
> the merger trees in yt-2.x have come to the end of their roads.  I could be
> convinced otherwise, but given the fact that they are broken at this time,
> we need to make a decision by the release of yt-3.0.  I see a few options:
>
> 1. Remove the existing merger trees from the yt-3.0 codebase now, but
> leave the page in the documentation containing only a note that this
> functionality does not yet exist in 3.0, but is still available in 2.x.  I
> think there are a few people (including me) who have building a new
> 3.0-compliant merger tree on their radar so I do not envision us going
> without for too long.
>
> 2. Keep the existing code and throw NotImplementedYet exceptions when it
> is imported.  Additionally, remove all imports to non-existing machinery
> like the HaloProfiler.  Add a note to the documentation stating that this
> no longer works but is waiting for help to be ported.
>
> 3. Fix one or both of them now to at least be functional (if not
> optimally) by the yt-3.0 release.  I personally cannot do this.  If you
> vote for this option, you should be willing to commit to do this.
>
> I am mostly interested in hearing from people who have a stake in the halo
> merger trees, but all input is welcome.
>
> Britton
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>


-- 
Cameron Hummels
Postdoctoral Researcher
Steward Observatory
University of Arizona
http://chummels.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20140722/ede7c292/attachment.htm>


More information about the yt-dev mailing list