[yt-dev] proposal to merge yt-3.0 development into main repo

[Sam Skillman]

+1


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:38 AM, j s oishi <jsoishi at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1. Let's do this.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd be +1 on this.  Keep the yt-3.0 branch separate, make
>> yt_analysis/yt-3.0 read-only, and move yt-3.0 the branch itself into
>> the main yt_analysis/yt repository.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:29 AM, John Wise <jwise at physics.gatech.edu>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > As someone that just moved to the yt-3.0 repo (and not having much time
>> for
>> > dev anymore...), I think this is a good idea.  Having it separate was a
>> > barrier for me because 2.x worked for most of my analysis, and I just
>> kept
>> > on using 2.x because of convenience.  However, if the latest changes
>> were in
>> > the main repo, then users could easily switch to the 3.0 branch and test
>> > things out.
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > John
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/26/2013 07:20 AM, Britton Smith wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> Now that we have pushed out the last (or nearly the last) major release
>> >> of yt-2.x, many are now joining the effort to work on yt-3.0.  As you
>> >> may have noticed, there is a yt-3.0 branch in the main yt repo hosted
>> at
>> >> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt.  However, most of the actual
>> >> development has been happening in a separate yt-3.0 repo
>> >> (https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt-3.0).
>> >>
>> >> I think it may now be time to consider moving yt-3.0 development over
>> to
>> >> the main repository.  I think this will lower the barrier of entry for
>> a
>> >> number of people and should not be a big problem to users of 2.x now
>> >> that that version has mostly stabilized.
>> >>
>> >> As for logistics, a number of people have done work in forks of the
>> >> yt-3.0, so we should not remove it entirely.  Instead, I propose making
>> >> it read-only, and having people push their changes to a fork of the
>> main
>> >> yt repo and working off of that from now on.  The magic of mercurial
>> >> should make this relatively painless.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts?  +/-1?
>> >>
>> >> Britton
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> yt-dev mailing list
>> >> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > John Wise
>> > Assistant Professor of Physics
>> > Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, Georgia Tech
>> > http://cosmo.gatech.edu
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > yt-dev mailing list
>> > yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> > http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20131126/d3377d5d/attachment.htm>