[yt-dev] Proposed: Moving yt from GPLv3 to BSD-like license

Sam Skillman samskillman at gmail.com
Fri Jul 12 07:14:24 PDT 2013


Yea.

I agree that this will benefit us more than it could potentially harm us.
 As for the particular license, the IPython license seems fine to me,
though maybe we should follow the exact layout of the modified 3-clause
BSD. Doesn't really matter.

Sam



On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Skory <s at skory.us> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> as someone who has crossed over to the dark side (i.e. working for the
> man), I would say that a more permissive license is a good thing. In
> my short time in my new job we have already had discussions about
> whether or not we can use certain OS software from a legal standpoint.
> I don't think anyone wants to take OS work and sneakily use it or
> steal it, but we do want to create proprietary extensions and
> enhancements without fear of being forced to release our work.
>
> I think that a switch is a good thing.
>
> --
> Stephen Skory
> s at skory.us
> http://stephenskory.com/
> 510.621.3687 (google voice)
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20130712/c21637fe/attachment.html>


More information about the yt-dev mailing list