[yt-dev] Answer testing

Britton Smith brittonsmith at gmail.com
Thu Feb 14 09:10:39 PST 2013


+1 on 2.
On Feb 14, 2013 12:08 PM, "Sam Skillman" <samskillman at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 on (2)
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently we run all unit and answer tests on every push.  Running answer
>> testing, particularly with FLASH data, takes a long time.  (Sidenote:
>> FLASH in
>> 2.x is particularly bad for large data objects, which answer testing
>> does.)
>> This will get worse once Orion and Chombo have been added.  I think we're
>> looking at up to 15 minutes per run.  This has two effects:
>>
>> 1) Changes which break unit tests take longer to get reported.
>> 2) We'll go through our ShiningPanda monthly allocation quite quickly.
>>
>> There are two solutions that I see:
>>
>> 1) Buy more time on ShiningPanda
>> 2) Only run answer testing at most once a day, but still run unit tests
>> on every
>> push.
>>
>> My proposal is to go with #2 with the backup of #1 as needed.  Can I get
>> [+-]1
>> on this?
>>
>> -Matt
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20130214/850e9527/attachment.htm>


More information about the yt-dev mailing list