[yt-dev] RAMSES Todo List

Matthew Turk matthewturk at gmail.com
Mon Dec 2 13:02:13 PST 2013


Hi Sam,

What're the metallicity units for RAMSES?  Nathan and I are updating
for the yt-3.0 unit refactor and we're trying to get the RAMSES
conversion done today.

-Matt

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Sam Geen <samgeen at astro.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to try to fiddle with the RAMSES frontend when I have time/need,
> and thought it would be good to collate a list of tasks that need to be
> completed so we have a consensus on what needs to be fixed. Feel free to
> suggest things or tell me that they're already implemented if I missed them:
>
> 1) Add support for RT and ATON files, which are now part of the default
> RAMSES (I assume from the code that the cooling and grav files are already
> read)
> 2) Via 1), it might be nice to refactor the RAMSESDomainFile class a bit to
> provide a more generic Ramses file reading routine/class, since the formats
> of the files are fairly similar and in doing 1) we might get some copy-paste
> bloat.
> 3) Allow for RAMSES runs that only contain AMR & particles (i.e. pure N-body
> runs with no hydro)
> 4) Refactor the inputs to fit YT default field names (for MHD, RT and ATON).
> 5) Allow YT to interpret non-cosmological simulations in RAMSES, or if it
> already does, remove the warning that says this.
> 6) Romain Teyssier suggested allowing users to specify their own default
> field names for user-modified versions of RAMSES. I don't know if YT caches
> data that would allow this, but I thought I'd punt the suggestion along.
> Another option could be to allow users to expose the RAMSES namelist files
> to YT (i.e. the parameter files for starting up a run) - these contain a lot
> more information on the physics included, etc. I'd put this on a low
> priority unless someone thinks of something clever that solves this cleanly.
> 7) It could be worthwhile to implement read-on-demand if it's not already -
> sometimes the users won't query the ATON/RT/hydro/particle file or certain
> fluid fields in each file and so we wouldn't need to read those files in
> that case. This could be folded into 2).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sam
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org



More information about the yt-dev mailing list