[yt-dev] proposal to replace enzo_tiny_cosmology data

[Matthew Turk]

Hi all,

I think this would be good.  I'd like to keep the old data, but add
this in addition -- perhaps it would be good to keep a shorter name,
something like, enzo_rich_cosmo or something?

-Matt

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Cameron Hummels <chummels at gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 with Nathan's suggestion.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Doug,
>>
>> Yes: http://yt-project.org/data
>>
>> The data is stored statically on a webserver hosted by dreamhost. There is
>> also an answer testing pack that includes duplicates of all the datasets
>> used in yt's answer testing suite. If you want to add some ARTIO data,
>> you'll have to go through one of the people who have access to the server.
>> Right now that's me, matt, cameron, and britton. One of us can also easily
>> add one of your ssh public keys if you want direct access to upload the
>> data. We'd prefer if it's less than 5 GB and stored in a gzipped tarball to
>> speed up transfers on slow and/or international connections.
>>
>> We'd really love to have public data available for as many frontends as
>> possible as it makes debugging much easier if there is some test data to
>> work with that everyone has access to.
>>
>> -Nathan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Douglas Harvey Rudd <drudd at uchicago.edu>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there any general place for frontends to put example datasets?
>>>
>>> On Aug 13, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Wha about keeping that data available, but add a new one with the physics
>>> enabled?  enzo_tiny_uvb_chemistry_cosmology?
>>>
>>> Dreamhost offers unlimited storage with no download or upload limit so it
>>> doesn't cost anyone anything to have the extra data available.
>>>
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, August 13, 2013, Britton Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose that we replace the enzo_tiny_cosmology dataset
>>>> that we store for various examples with one that has a few more physics
>>>> modules enabled.  Hilary Egan has issued PRs to yt and yt-doc for a very
>>>> nice set of absorption line fitting tools.  The recipe provided works really
>>>> well with a small cosmology simulation, but the ones we have up now are
>>>> missing some key physics (H/He chemistry and a UV background) that make the
>>>> output from the recipe look quite poor.
>>>>
>>>> We have been able to make a very nice looking recipe using the same
>>>> enzo_tiny_cosmology parameter file with these additions, which do not add
>>>> significantly to the overall size of the dataset.  Additionally, none of the
>>>> existing recipes that use this data will change.  I think there will also
>>>> probably be more analysis_modules coming in the future that will benefit
>>>> from using a slightly more sophisticated example dataset.
>>>>
>>>> Can we get a +/-1 on replacement?
>>>>
>>>> Britton
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cameron Hummels
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Steward Observatory
> University of Arizona
> http://chummels.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>