[yt-dev] proposal to replace enzo_tiny_cosmology data

[Cameron Hummels]

+1 with Nathan's suggestion.


On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hey Doug,
>
> Yes: http://yt-project.org/data
>
> The data is stored statically on a webserver hosted by dreamhost. There is
> also an answer testing pack that includes duplicates of all the datasets
> used in yt's answer testing suite. If you want to add some ARTIO data,
> you'll have to go through one of the people who have access to the server.
>  Right now that's me, matt, cameron, and britton. One of us can also easily
> add one of your ssh public keys if you want direct access to upload the
> data. We'd prefer if it's less than 5 GB and stored in a gzipped tarball to
> speed up transfers on slow and/or international connections.
>
> We'd really love to have public data available for as many frontends as
> possible as it makes debugging much easier if there is some test data to
> work with that everyone has access to.
>
> -Nathan
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Douglas Harvey Rudd <drudd at uchicago.edu>wrote:
>
>>  Is there any general place for frontends to put example datasets?
>>
>>  On Aug 13, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
>>    wrote:
>>
>> Wha about keeping that data available, but add a new one with the physics
>> enabled?  enzo_tiny_uvb_chemistry_cosmology?
>>
>>  Dreamhost offers unlimited storage with no download or upload limit so
>> it doesn't cost anyone anything to have the extra data available.
>>
>>  Nathan
>>
>> On Tuesday, August 13, 2013, Britton Smith wrote:
>>
>>>   Hi all,
>>>
>>>  I would like to propose that we replace the enzo_tiny_cosmology dataset
>>> that we store for various examples with one that has a few more physics
>>> modules enabled.  Hilary Egan has issued PRs to yt and yt-doc for a very
>>> nice set of absorption line fitting tools.  The recipe provided works
>>> really well with a small cosmology simulation, but the ones we have up now
>>> are missing some key physics (H/He chemistry and a UV background) that make
>>> the output from the recipe look quite poor.
>>>
>>>  We have been able to make a very nice looking recipe using the same
>>> enzo_tiny_cosmology parameter file with these additions, which do not add
>>> significantly to the overall size of the dataset.  Additionally, none of
>>> the existing recipes that use this data will change.  I think there will
>>> also probably be more analysis_modules coming in the future that will
>>> benefit from using a slightly more sophisticated example dataset.
>>>
>>>  Can we get a +/-1 on replacement?
>>>
>>>  Britton
>>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>


-- 
Cameron Hummels
Postdoctoral Researcher
Steward Observatory
University of Arizona
http://chummels.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20130813/b7d54725/attachment.htm>