[yt-dev] proposal to replace enzo_tiny_cosmology data

[Douglas Harvey Rudd]

Is there any general place for frontends to put example datasets?

On Aug 13, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com<mailto:nathan12343 at gmail.com>>
 wrote:

Wha about keeping that data available, but add a new one with the physics enabled?  enzo_tiny_uvb_chemistry_cosmology?

Dreamhost offers unlimited storage with no download or upload limit so it doesn't cost anyone anything to have the extra data available.

Nathan

On Tuesday, August 13, 2013, Britton Smith wrote:
Hi all,

I would like to propose that we replace the enzo_tiny_cosmology dataset that we store for various examples with one that has a few more physics modules enabled.  Hilary Egan has issued PRs to yt and yt-doc for a very nice set of absorption line fitting tools.  The recipe provided works really well with a small cosmology simulation, but the ones we have up now are missing some key physics (H/He chemistry and a UV background) that make the output from the recipe look quite poor.

We have been able to make a very nice looking recipe using the same enzo_tiny_cosmology parameter file with these additions, which do not add significantly to the overall size of the dataset.  Additionally, none of the existing recipes that use this data will change.  I think there will also probably be more analysis_modules coming in the future that will benefit from using a slightly more sophisticated example dataset.

Can we get a +/-1 on replacement?

Britton
_______________________________________________
yt-dev mailing list
yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org<mailto:yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org>
http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20130813/0913b263/attachment.htm>