[yt-dev] reorganizing YTEPs

[Britton Smith]

Nathan,

I think that's a pretty good idea. I take this conversation to a new YTEP.

Britton
On Apr 29, 2013 2:38 PM, "Nathan Goldbaum" <goldbaum at ucolick.org> wrote:

> Hi Britton,
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The question I have for people is with regard to process.  In order to
>> have statuses for the unaccepted proposals, they have to exist in some
>> fashion in the main repo.  How do we want to do that?  Or do we want to do
>> that?  One way would be to issue a PR that would include adding it to the
>> index as Draft status and have it be accepted quickly.  People can still
>> leave comments on a merged PR and the author can then issue a new one which
>> moves the listing to the accepted status.
>>
>
> This seems like a sensible approach.  It would also be useful to have a
> meta-YTEP on the YTEP process so the whole process could be codified
> somehow.  I could see this existing either within the PEP-0-esque YTEP
> you've suggested or within a new YTEP.
>
> -Nathan
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20130429/36d278fd/attachment.html>