[yt-dev] [yt_analysis/yt] Document the field_cuts keyword arg for projections. (issue #555)

Matthew Turk matthewturk at gmail.com
Mon Apr 22 18:09:07 PDT 2013


I thought it was. If not, it can be easily done so, I think. I think the
issue was with the overlap projection, but that the quadtree was flexible
enough to handle it.
On Apr 22, 2013 8:44 PM, "Britton Smith" <brittonsmith at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is doing a projection with a source region parallelizable?  The field_cuts
> keyword will allow projections to still work in parallel.  This could be
> the value of keeping it around.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hmm, should we still do this or instead rely on cut regions?
>> On Apr 22, 2013 8:28 PM, "Britton Smith" <issues-reply at bitbucket.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> New issue 555: Document the field_cuts keyword arg for projections.
>>>
>>> https://bitbucket.org/yt_analysis/yt/issue/555/document-the-field_cuts-keyword-arg-for
>>>
>>> Britton Smith:
>>>
>>> Some discussion should be added to the field_cuts section in
>>> analyzing/objects section that discusses this specific use with projections.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yt-dev mailing list
>>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yt-dev mailing list
>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20130422/f82ae456/attachment.html>


More information about the yt-dev mailing list