[yt-dev] Testing Infrastructure: Datasets for ART, Orion, FLASH, etc ...

Britton Smith brittonsmith at gmail.com
Sun Oct 14 19:12:50 PDT 2012


Hi Matt and all,

This is great!  I am interested in getting involved and am willing to be a
user or administrator, whatever makes the most sense.

I am going to try this week to start some writing tests as well.

Britton

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com> wrote:

> I forgot to point at the URL for the Shining Panda instance:
>
> https://jenkins.shiningpanda-ci.com/yt-project/
>
> New repos we pull from and test will show up here.
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Nathan et al,
> >
> > We just got approved for a FLOSS license on Shining Panda.  As it
> > currently stands, we can't mount EBS volumes, so answer testing will
> > not be a part of this initiative as of right now.  Kacper's suggested
> > we explore other options for answer testing, and I think he's right --
> > particularly because we may end up using a lot of memory and putting
> > strain on an individual node, and that's probably bad karma.  So I
> > think we should keep the two somewhat separately tested for now, and
> > continue creating unit tests that test either randomly created
> > in-memory data or isolated functionality.
> >
> > I can add users and administrators to the SP account:
> >
> > https://www.shiningpanda-ci.com/docs/dashboard/multiusers.html
> >
> > We also can identify different repos that get pulled from to test.  I
> > think we definitely want to test the main yt repository and the main
> > yt-3.0 repository (once it has tests finalized.)  We can also add a
> > few "semi-trusted" repositories -- for instance, Sam does a lot of
> > development in his fork, so he may want to have it added to the
> > buildbots.  I do a lot, so I may also want mine added.
> >
> > If you have a "user" role you can make it test any time you want.
> >
> > If you have an administrator role you can do the same but also add new
> > repos to test.
> >
> > Would anyone like to be added as a "user"?  I think this would also
> > need to coincide with having your personal repository added as a
> > testing location.  For administrator, I think we should restrict to
> > people who have been really involved in the pull request and code
> > mentoring process.
> >
> > Kacper and I are going to hash out some answer testing stuff in IRC
> > before coming back to the list with any ideas.  But clearly we need to
> > ensure we cover both answer testing AND unit testing in the
> > infrastructure we develop.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12343 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> $144/year is well worth it and it's probably good karma to support them
> since they have to pay for the infrastructure.
> >>
> >> +1 (although it's not my money ;)
> >>
> >> On Oct 12, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Matthew Turk wrote:
> >>
> >>> [snip]
> >>>
> >>>> I've emailed Shining Panda about this, but if they don't
> >>>> have the ability to provide us with a FLOSS license, I think we can
> >>>> identify some funding to do this.
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>>
> >>> Okay, we're laughably far back in their queue.  I'm inclined to think
> >>> that if we get a couple people who look at Shining Panda, think it
> >>> looks good and so on, that we just upgrade the plan to be paid for so
> >>> that we don't have to wait and we can fix this problem now instead of
> >>> in some distant date.  What do y'all think?
> >>>
> >>> http://shiningpanda-ci.com
> >>>
> >>> -Matt
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> yt-dev mailing list
> >>> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> yt-dev mailing list
> >> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> >> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
> _______________________________________________
> yt-dev mailing list
> yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spacepope.org/pipermail/yt-dev-spacepope.org/attachments/20121014/8555f31c/attachment.html>


More information about the yt-dev mailing list