[Yt-dev] HaloProfiler vs. enzo_anyl

[John Wise]

On 14 Apr 2011, at 14:54, John Wise wrote:

>>> I agree with this.  After thinking about it and reading Britton's response, I think #3 would be the best option.  A possible solution to calculating the cooling time post-runtime would be to add a command line option to Enzo that adds the CoolingTime to the data, similar to the potential field output command line option.  The catch is that you'd have to make sure that you use the same version as you ran the simulation.
>> 
>> I agree, that would be great.  Do you think this is straightforward?
>> I have looked before at the WritePotential stuff, but I'm not sure I'm
>> the best person to add this.
> 
> I could add this pretty quickly.  I'll try to do it today.

Just to follow up, I've added this functionality in Enzo in changeset 5f6d02a5f495.

John