[Yt-dev] Verbosity Increase

Cameron Hummels chummels at astro.columbia.edu
Tue Dec 7 12:32:50 PST 2010


A little late, but +1.  As you note, I think we need to be careful we're
not pushing *too* much information to the user (as then it all looks
like noise), and also make sure these lookups don't slow down the
process significantly.  It would be a shame to lose the speed of yt for
this additional behavior.

Cameron

On 12/7/10 3:06 PM, Matthew Turk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Okay, it's pretty unanimous.  I'll make the changes and push 'em.  Thanks!
>
> -Matt
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Sam Skillman <samskillman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Britton Smith <brittonsmith at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:21 PM, j s oishi <jsoishi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> These kinds of simulation parameters are good to print. I'm a solid
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> on both of these changes. I also love print_stats, and having more
>>>> data there is a good thing.
>>>>
>>>> j
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Matthew Turk <matthewturk at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to propose that we increase the verbosity of two
>>>>> operations:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) When a parameter file is parsed, I would like several pieces of
>>>>> information output via the "INFO" level of the logging handler.  This
>>>>> would be the current simulation time, the dimensions of the domain,
>>>>> and any cosmological parameters.
>>>>> 2) When print_stats is called in the hierarchy, I would like to
>>>>> include all of the cosmological parameters.
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason I'm bringing this up rather than just changing it is that
>>>>> in the past yt has (rightly) been accused of being too verbose (in
>>>>> fact, it was one of the first things Jeff said to me the first time we
>>>>> met to talk about yt!) and I don't want to increase that
>>>>> unnecessarily.  But, I feel strongly that as we move into more codes
>>>>> we need to be more upfront about what yt thinks of a given simulation
>>>>> output.  I think that this will also help ensure that errors are
>>>>> avoided.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1/-1?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matt
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Yt-dev mailing list
>>>>> Yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Yt-dev mailing list
>>>> Yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Yt-dev mailing list
>>> Yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Yt-dev mailing list
>> Yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
>> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Yt-dev mailing list
> Yt-dev at lists.spacepope.org
> http://lists.spacepope.org/listinfo.cgi/yt-dev-spacepope.org
>



More information about the yt-dev mailing list